write decent comments. with names and email
Archive for September, 2007
Fokana: write your comments
Friday, September 28th, 2007Fokana: Let us support the convention
Thursday, September 20th, 2007It is time to end the quarrel.
Sasidharan Nair and the Houston team have come forward to host the convention as scheduled. It deserves our support.
The other group too said that they have no problem in holding the convention in Houston under Sasidharan Nair and Aniyan George.
That means nobody has any opposition for them leading the convention. The other group said earlier that the posts like president and secreatry are to be given after an election only. Till an election is held, let them use any name.
I think, the board of trustees can call for a general body. Let the general body comlpete the election.
Till then, all people should work together. The proposed board of directors meeting on Sept 27, should bring reconciliation. It should not create more division by their actions.
Reconciliation at this stage is the only way to avoid a split in the organization.
A wellwisher of Fokana
People of Kerala: The Educated Idiots
Friday, September 14th, 2007Fokana: Vilanilam’s suggestions
Saturday, September 8th, 2007Dear Friends:
It is very sad and unfortunate that FOKANA crisis still
lingers on without any resolution in the horizon.
I have a humble proposal as follows:
The ultimate authority of any organization is its
general body and in the case of FOKANA the
body of representatives from its member
associations is the General Body.
Now two warring factions have published notice for
General Body.
This is confusing and dividing the Malayalee diaspora in America.
My proposal is that all
the members of Board of Trustees [belonging to
both groups] jointly send a Notice for
General Body meeting and let that General Body
decide the future of FOKANA.
Hope all peace loving and committed
leaders of FOKANA will consider this
proposal with a positive spirit.
Alex V. Koshy Global President,
World Malayalee Council
Fokana case
Saturday, September 8th, 2007Case Information
Court System: Circuit Court for Montgomery County – Civil System
Case Number: 283874V Sub Type: OTHER TORTS
Date Filed: 06/25/2007
Case Status: OPEN
Plaintiff Information
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Plaintiff is displayed)
Name: FEDERATION OF KERALA ASSOCIATION IN NORTH AMERICA
Address: 9000 ACREDALE COURT
COLLEGE PARK MD 20740
Plaintiff Aliases
Name: FOKANA
Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff
Name: POLITZER, M. ARNOLD
Address: ATTORNEY AT LAW
SUITE 212
40 W. CHESAPEAKE AVENUE
TOWSON MD 21204
Name: KOSHY, GEORGE Address: 15 CROSSBROOK ROAD
LIVINGSTON NJ 07039
Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff
Name: POLITZER, M. ARNOLD
Defendant Information(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Defendant is displayed)
Name: CHACKCO, T S
Address: 399 GRAPHIC BLVD
LIVINGSTON NJ 07039
Name: ISAAC, JOHN
Address: 7 PHEASANT RUN ROAD
PUTNAM VALLEY NY 10579
Name: KARUKAPPILLIL, PAUL
Address: 7 NORTH HARRISON AVE
CONGERS NY 10920
Name: KORATH, GEORGE
Address: 16303 OAYTON COURT
TAMPA FL 33647
Issues Information
Issue: FRAUD-MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS
Issue: RESTRAINING ORDER
Document Tracking
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 1
Docket Description: BILL OF COMPLAINT
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AFFIDAVIT AND ATTACHMENTS, FILED.
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 2
Docket Description: MOTION, SHORTEN TIME
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Plaintiff Status: Open
Docket Text: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME AND POINTS AND AUTHORITIES, FILED.
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 3
Docket Description: NOTICE, NEW CASE NUMBER
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: NOTICE SENT/HANDED GIVING NEW CASE NUMBER TO ALL PARTIES.
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 4
Docket Description: SUMMONS ISSUED
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: FOUR 60 DAY SUMMONSES ISSUED FOR PERSONAL SERVICE AND HANDED TO ATTORNEY.
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 5
Docket Description: HEARING
Docket Type: Docket
Ruling Judge: BEARD, DELAWRENCE
Docket Text: HEARING (BEARD, J.) ON PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (#1). MR. POLITZER, PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL PRESENT.
Audio Media: 17-062507 Start: 14:30:17 Stop: 14:42:00
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 6
Docket Description: FINAL DISPOSITION (ALL ISSUES RESOLVED)
Docket Type: Docket
Ruling Judge: BEARD, DELAWRENCE
Docket Text: COURT (BEARD, J.) DENIES, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (#1).
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 7
Docket Description: EXHIBITS ADMITTED AND FILED
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT #1 ADMITTED AND FILED.
Docket Date: 06/25/2007 Docket Number: 8
Docket Description: EXHIBIT SHEET FILED
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: EXHIBIT SHEET, FILED.
Docket Date: 08/30/2007 Docket Number: 9
Docket Description: SUMMONS RETURNED
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: SUMMONS RETURNED FILED. (NEVER PICKED UP BY ATTORNEY)
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=283874V&loc=68&detailLoc=MCCI
Narco analysis is cruel, illegal in most countries
Tuesday, September 4th, 2007Narco Analysis Test or Narco Test: This refers to the practice of administering barbiturates or certain other chemical substances, most often Pentothal Sodium, to lower a subject’s inhibitions, in the hope that the subject will more freely share information and feelings. The term Narco Analysis was coined by Horseley. Narco analysis first reached the mainstream in 1922, when Robert House, a Texas obstretrician used the drug scopolamine on two prisoners.Since then narco testing has become largely discredited in most democratic states, including the United States and Britain. There is a vast body of literature calling into question its ability to yield legal truth. Additionally, narcoanalysis has serious legal and ethical implications.
A person is able to lie by using his imagination. In the Narco Analysis Test, the subject’s inhibitions are lowered by interfering with his nervous system at the molecular level. In this state, it becomes difficult though not impossible for him to lie .In such sleep-like state efforts are made to obtain “probative truth” about the crime. Experts inject a subject with hypnotics like Sodium Pentothal or Sodium Amytal under the controlled circumstances of the laboratory. The dose is dependent on the person’s sex, age, health and physical condition. The subject which is put in a state of Hypnotism is not in a position to speak up on his own but can answer specific but simple questions after giving some suggestions. This type of test is not always admissible in the law courts. It states that subjects under a semi-conscious state do not have the mind set to properly answer any questions, while some other courts openly accept them as evidence. Studies have shown that it is possible to lie under narcoanalysis and its reliability as an investigative tool is questioned in most countries. A few democratic countries, India most notably, still continue to use narcoanalysis. This has come under increasing criticism from the public and the media in that country. Narcoanalysis is not openly permitted for investigative purposes in most developed and/or democratic countries.
In India, the Narco Analysis test is done by a team comprising of an anaesthesiologist, a psychiatrist, a clinical/ forensic psychologist, an audio-videographer, and supporting nursing staff.The forensic psychologist will prepare the report about the revelations, which will be accompanied by a compact disc of audio-video recordings. The strength of the revelations, if necessary, is further verified by subjecting the person to polygraph and brain mapping tests.
Fokana: welcome the convention
Monday, September 3rd, 2007s^m¡m\: C\nbpw Hê tItkm?
s^m¡m\ Ce£³ d±m¡ns¡m¬ SpÅ sabv 16þse hn[n sacnem³Unse tam¬ SvtKmadn tImSXn ho¬ Spw icn h¨p. F³.Pn. amX| tIkv ]p\¸cnsim[n¡m³ \ÂInb lÀPnbmé XÅnbXp.
CXns\Xnsc ho¬ Spw A¸o \ÂIWsa¶mé HutZymKnI hn`mKw Xoêam\n¨sX¶dnbpì.
AXnë ]pdsa lq̬ I¬ hv³jëÅ Hê¡hpambn aps¶m«p t]mImëw Xoêam\n¨XmbmWdnhp.
I¬ hv³jëÅ \S]Snç FÃm aebmfnIfqsSbpw ]n´pWbp¬ sSì XoÀ¨. kwLS\ \ne\n¡Wsa¦n I¬ h³j³ \St¡¬ SXp Bhiyw Xs¶.
]s£ C\nbpw Hê tItkm? AXp Xoêam\w BIm³ F{X Imew FSpçsaì BÀ¡dnbw?
{]iv\w \o¬ Sp t]mIWsaì A{Klnç¶ NneÀ c¬ Sp Iq«¯nepw D¬ sS¶v FÃhÀçw Adnbmw. AhÀ Bscms¡ BsWìw.
A¸o t]mbm Pbnçsaì F´mé Dd¸p? c¬ Sp tImSXn CXn\Iw XÅnb tIkmé. IWz³jt\mSp ASp¯ kab¯p tZmjIcamb Hê hn[n IqSn h¶m AXp I¬ hv³js\¯s¶ _m[n¡ntÃ?
AXnepw F{Xtbm \ÃXmé Hê Ahkm\ h«w F¶ \nebn Hê H¯qXoÀ¸p {iaw IqSn \S¯p¶Xp.
Ad_nþC{ktben {]iv\w Hgn¨m aäv FÃm {]iv§Äçw temIw NÀN hgnbmé ]cnlmcw I¬ SXp.
{]iv\w C§s\ \o«ns¡m¬ Sp t]mbn«v X¼n Nms¡msbm, Sn.Fkv. Nms¡m hn`mKsam Hìw t\Sp¶nÃ. I¬ h³j³ F´mbmepw \St¯¬ SXv iin[c³ \mbêw A\nb³ tPmÀPpw tNÀ¶mé. AXnë BÀçw FXnÀ¸pw CÃ. AXnëÅ kmlNcysamê¡m³ Sn.Fkv. Nmt¡m hn`mK¯nëw ISabp¬ Sp.
s^m¡m\ {]iv\w c¬ Sp {SÌn t_mÀUv X½nepÅ {]iv\amIêXp. Sn.Fkv. Nmt¡mçw aäp {SÌnamÀçsaXnsc tPmÀPv tImin \ÂInb lÀPnbn Pq¬ 25þë tijw Hê \S]Snbpw D¬ Smbn«nÃ.
F´mbmepw H¯pXoÀ¸në Hê Ahkm\ {iaw IqSn D¬ SmIWsa¶mé P\w B{Klnç¶Xp.
Fokna case
Monday, September 3rd, 2007| Docket Date: | 08/27/2007 Docket Number: 29 |
| Docket Description: | HEARING |
| Docket Type: | Ruling Status: Denied |
| Ruling Judge: | JOHNSON, ERIC M |
| Reference Docket(s): | Motion: 23 Opposition: 26 |
| Docket Text: | HEARING ON DEFENDANTS NADUVILAMURI G. MATHEW AND FOKANA’S MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF MAY 16, 2007 ORDER (#23) (JOHNSON, J.) DENIED. PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL, MR. NIXON, APPEARED. DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL, MR. POLITZER, APPEARED. |
| Audio Media: |
03-082707 Start: 10:38:14 Stop: 10:56:55 |
see details: http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=274000V&detailLoc=MCCI
Case number: 274000V